Arms and Armor of the Greeks

Arms and Armor of the GreeksInBC A Force Of Some , Athenians And Their Allies Met A Much Larger Persian Army On The Rocky Beach At Marathon The Greeks Arrayed Themselves In A Thin Line, Advancing On The Persians Slowly, Then Breaking Into A Run, Splitting The Center And Enfolding The Persian Army In Their Wings The Tactic Surprised The Persians, And Even Some Greeks But, Argues Cambridge University Archaeologist AM Snodgrass, Tactical Innovation Alone Did Not Carry The Day We Shall Never Know Quite How Marathon Was Won, He Writes, But The Superiority Of Greek Equipment Must Have Been An Important Factor Here And Elsewhere, And At Times Perhaps A Decisive One The Greeks, In Short, Were Better Armed Than The Persians, An Edge That Had Evolved Over Centuries Of Martial Experimentation Snodgrass Traces The Development Of Armor And Weapons And The Use Of Adjuncts Like Cavalry And War Dogs Through Greek History, From Mycenaean Times To The Age Of Alexander He Notes, Gainsaying Many Other Military Historians Of Ancient Greece, That The Greeks Were Nowhere Near As Effective In Using Cavalry As Were Their Opponents, Persian And Otherwise Even In Alexander S Time, He Writes, Cavalry Was Neglected In Favor Of Mass Infantry Attacks From Heavily Armed Phalanxes A Tactic That Must Have Cost Many Lives, But That Surely Put An Unholy Fear In The Greeks Enemies Snodgrass S Slender Volume Is A Useful Companion For Students Of Herodotus, Xenophon, Homer, And Other Chroniclers Of Ancient WarfareGregory McNamee

Is a well-known author, some of his books are a fascination for readers like in the Arms and Armor of the Greeks book, this is one of the most wanted Anthony Snodgrass author readers around the world.

[PDF / Epub] ☂ Arms and Armor of the Greeks By Anthony Snodgrass –
  • 151 pages
  • Arms and Armor of the Greeks
  • Anthony Snodgrass
  • 15 September 2018
  • 9780500400036

10 thoughts on “Arms and Armor of the Greeks

  1. says:

    Inarguably the go to book on the material record for Ancient Greek military history It s dated, but I don t think this detracts at all from the book Snodgrass discussion of the development of equipment, the regional variance, and the practical applications of Ancient Greek militaria from the archaic period through the Hellenistic Age is cogent, relevant and revelatory The book is lively and engaging, and is often at odds to discussion of ancient warfare that comes from largely literary sources This dissonance underscores to importance of looking at ALL the evidence Worth your time.

  2. says:

    This is a new edition of the original book from 1967, published in 1999 The only difference is an afterword in which Snodgrass comments on the state of then current research Otherwise, this is just as useful an introduction to newcomers to ancient Greek warfare as the original book Written by an archaeologist, it offers a practical approach to the field than similar books written by historians.

  3. says:

    This book is an overview of ancient Greek warfare that expands on Snodgrass s earlier PhD dissertation, published in 1964 as Early Greek Armour and Weapons Even after nearly 50 years, that book is still the starting point when it comes to studying Early Greek arms and armour Later books have expanded upon Snodgrass s work, especially with the ongoing publication of excavation results from sites such as Olympia and the continued appearance of new syntheses, but despite all this it has withstood the test of time It is a pity that, to the best of my knowledge, the book has never been reprinted, but copies of it should be available in any half decent academic library This book builds on that foundation and is recommended reading to anyone wishing to familiarize themselves with ancient Greek warfare.

  4. says:

    The book covered the topics of the various Greek military weapons and armor from the Mycenaean age until the sixth century B.C., including the helmet, shield, body armor, sword, spear, the bow and arrow, the chariot, horses and their armor, the ax, and the sling Primary source literary evidences were considered, such as the Homeric poems and other contemporary poetry and later writers The author cited works of many other historians e.g., Lorimer, H Hecken, Dr H W Catling, Gero von Merhart, and W D onna , and critiqued their evidence, weighing it to his own studies and the evidence The relevant artifacts were described and divided into relevant groups Information about the artifacts was also provided, such as the museum catalogue numbers and where they were found I felt that the author s conclusions were well founded on the evidence and critical reason.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *